50 Years of ITAL/JLA
A Bibliometric Study of Its Major Influences, Themes, and Interdisciplinarity
Over five decades, Information Technology and Libraries (and its predecessor, the Journal of Library Automation) has influenced research and practice in the library and information science technology. From its inception on, the journal has been consistently ranked as one of the superior publications in the profession and a trendsetter for all types of librarians and researchers. This research examines ITAL using a citation analysis of all 878 peer-reviewed feature articles published over the journal’s 51 volumes. Impactful authors, articles, publications, and themes from the journal’s history are identified. The findings of this study provide insight into the history of ITAL and potential topics of interest to ITAL authors and readership.
Imad Al-Sabbagh, “Evolution of the Interdisciplinarity of Information Science: A Bibliometric Study” (PhD diss., Florida State University, 1987).
Encyclopedia Britannica, https://www.britannica.com/ (accessed Sept. 13, 2018).
Melissa K. McBurney and Pamela L. Novak, “What is Bibliometrics and Why Should You Care?” Professional Communication Conference, IEEE (2002): 108-14, https://doi.org/10.1109/IPCC.2002.1049094.
Lutz Bornmann and Rudiger Mutz, “Growth Rates of Modern Science,” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 66, no. 11 (2015): 2, 215-222, https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23329.
Mu-Hsuan Huang and Yu-Wei Chang, “A Study of Interdisciplinarity in Information Science: Using Direct Citation and Co-authorship Analysis,” Journal of Information Science 37, no. 4 (2011): 369-78, https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551511407141.
Ming-Yueh Tsay, “Journal Bibliometric Analysis: A Case Study on the JASIST,” Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science 13, no. 2 (2008): 121-39, http://ejum.fsktm.um.edu.my/article/663.pdf.
Lois Buttlar, “Information Sources in Library and Information Science Doctoral Research,” Library & Information Science Research 21, no. 2 (1999): 227-45, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0740-8188(99)00005-5
R.V. Chikate and S.K. Patil, “Citation Analysis of Theses in Library and Information Science Submitted to University of Pune: A Pilot Study,” Library Philosophy and Practice 222 (2008).
Kuang-hua Chen and Chiung-fang Liang, “Disciplinary Interflow of Library and Information Science in Taiwan,” Journal of Library and Information Studies 2, no. 2 (2004): 31-55.
Akhtar Hussain and Nishat Fatima, “A Bibliometric Analysis of the ‘Chinese Librarianship: An International Electronic Journal,’ 2006-2010,” Chinese Librarianship 31, no. 1 (2011): 1-14, http://www.iclc.us/cliej/cl31HF.pdf.
Nosheen Fatima Warraich and Sajjad Ahmad, “Pakistan Journal of Library and Information Science: A Bibliometric Analysis,” Pakistan Journal of Information Management and Libraries 12, no. 1 (2011): 1-7. http://eprints.rclis.org/25600/.
S. Thanuskodi, “Bibliometric Analysis of the Journal Library Philosophy and Practice from 2005-2009,” Library Philosophy and Practice 437 (2010): 1-6. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/437/.
Manoj Kumar and A.L. Moorthy, “Bibliometric Analysis of DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology During 2001-2010,” DESICOC Journal of Library and Information Technology 31, no. 3 (2011): 203-08.
Antonio Ramos-Rodriguez and Jose Ruiz-Navarro, “Changes in the Intellectual Structure of Strategic Management Research: A Bibliographic Study of the Strategic Management Journal, 1980-2000,” Strategic Management Journal 25, no. 10 (2004): 981-1,004, https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.397.
Mariluz Fernandez-Alles and Antonio Ramos-Rodriguez, “Intellectual Structure of Human Resources Management Research: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Journal Human Resource Management, 1985-2005,” JASIST 60, no. 1 (2009): 161, https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20947.
Jill Crawley-Low, “Bibliometric Analysis of the American Journal of Veterinary Research to Produce a List of Core Veterinary Medicine Journals,” JMLA 94, no. 4 (2006): 430-34.
Kalervo Jarvelin and Pertti Vakkari, “The Evolution of Library and Information Science 1965-1985: A Content Analysis of Journal Articles,” Information Processing and Management 29, no. 1 (1993): 129-44, https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4573(93)90028-C.
R. Barry Lewis, “NVivo and ATLAS.ti 5.0: A Comparative Review of Two Popular Qualitative Data-Analysis Programs,” Field Methods 16, no. 4 (2004): 439-69, https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X04269174.
Thad Van Leeuwen, “The Application of Bibliometric Analyses in the Evaluation of Social Science Research: Who Benefits from It, and Why It is Still Feasible,” Scientometrics 66, no. 1 (2006): 133-54, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0010-7.
Richard van Noorden, “Interdisciplinarity Research by the Numbers,” Nature 525, no. 7569 (2015): 306-07, https://doi.org/10.1038/525306a.
Lutz Bornmann and Hans-Dieter Daniel, “What Do We Know about the h index,” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58, no. 9 (2007): 1,381-385, https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20609.
Linda C. Smith, “Citation Analysis,” Library Trends 30, no. 1 (1981): 83-106.
Copyright (c) 2019 Brady Lund
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.