Bento Box User Experience Study at Franklin University

  • Marc Jaffy Franklin University


This article discusses the benefits of the bento-box method of searching library resources, including a comparison of the method with a tabbed search interface. It then describes a usability study conducted by the Franklin University Library in which 27 students searched for an article, an ebook, and a journal on two websites: one using a bento box and one using the EBSCO Discovery Service (EDS). Screen recordings of the searches were reviewed to see what actions users took while looking for information on each site, as well as how long the searches took. Students also filled out questionnaires to indicate what they thought of each type of search. Overall students found more items on the bento-box site, and indicated a slight preference for the bento-box search over EDS. The bento-box site also provided quicker results than the EDS site. As a result, the Franklin University library decided to implement bento-box searching on its website.


Aaron Tay and Feng Yikang, “Implementing a Bento-Style Search in LibGuides V2,” Code4lib Journal no. 29 (July 2015),

Carol Diedrichs, “Discovery and Delivery: Making it Work for Users,” Serials Librarian 56, no. 1-4 (January 2009): 81,

Cole Hudson and Graham Hukill, “One-to-Many: Building a Single-Search Interface for Disparate Resources,” in K. Varnum (ed.) Exploring Discovery: The Front Door to Your Library’s Licensed and Digitized Content (Chicago: ALA Editions, 2016): 146.

Colleen Kenefick and Jennifer A. DeVito, “Google Expectations and Interlibrary Loan: Can We Ever Be Fast Enough?” Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery & Electronic Reserves 23, no. 3 (July 2013): 158,

Cory Lown, Tito Sierra, and Josh Boyer, “How Users Search the Library from a Single Search Box,” College & Research Libraries 74, no. 3 (2013): 229.

Elena Azadbakht, John Blair, and Lisa Jones, “Everyone's Invited: A Website Usability Study Involving Multiple Library Stakeholders,” Information Technology & Libraries 36, no. 4 (2017), 43,

Emily Singley, “To Bento Or Not to Bento—Displaying Search Results,”

Eric Phetteplace and Jeremy Darrington, “A Hybrid Approach to Discovery Services,” Reference & User Services Quarterly 53, no. 4 (2014): 293.

Irina Trapido, “Library Discovery Products: Discovering User Expectations through Failure Analysis.” Information Technology and Libraries 35, no. 3 (2016): 22,

Jonathan Rochkind, “Article Search Improvement Strategy,”

Nancy Turner, “Librarians do it Differently: Comparative Usability Testing with Students and Library Staff,” Journal of Web Librarianship 5, no. 4 (October 2011),

Scott Hanrath and Miloche Kottman, “Use and Usability of a Discovery Tool in an Academic Library,” Journal of Web Librarianship 9, no. 1 (January 2015): 4,

Suzanna Conrad and Nathasha Alvarez, “Conversations with Web Site Users: Using Focus Groups to Open Discussion and Improve User Experience,” Journal of Web Librarianship 10, no. 2 (April 2016): 71,

Suzanne Chapman et al., “Manually Classifying User Search Queries on an Academic Library Web Site,” Journal of Web Librarianship 7, no. 4 (October 2013): 419,

William Mischo, Michael Norman, and Mary Schlembach, “Innovations in Discovery Systems: User Studies and the Bento Approach,” Proceedings of the Charleston Library Conference (2017): 299,

How to Cite
Jaffy, M. (2020). Bento Box User Experience Study at Franklin University. Information Technology and Libraries, 39(1).