User Experience Methods and Maturity in Academic Libraries
This article presents a mixed-methods study of the methods and maturity of user experience (UX) practice in academic libraries. The authors apply qualitative content analysis and quantitative statistical analysis to a research dataset derived from a survey of UX practitioners. Results reveal the type and extent of UX methods currently in use by practitioners in academic libraries. Themes extracted from the survey responses also reveal a set of factors that influence the development of UX maturity. Analysis and discussion focus on organizational characteristics that influence UX methods and maturity. The authors conclude by offering a library-focused maturity scale with recommended practices for advancing UX maturity in academic libraries.
Aaron Schmidt and Amanda Etches, Useful, Usable, Desirable: Applying User Experience Design to Your Library (Chicago: ALA Editions, 2014).
Aja Bettencourt-McCarthy and Dawn Lowe-Wincentsen, “How Do Undergraduates Research? A User Experience Experience,” OLA Quarterly 22, no. 3 (February 22, 2017): 20–25, https://doi.org/10.7710/1093-7374.1866.
Amanda Kraft, “Parsing the Acronyms of User-Centered Design,” in 2019 ASCUE Proceedings (Association Supporting Computer Users in Education (ASCUE), Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, 2019), 61–69, https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED597115.
Amy Deschenes, “Improving the Library Homepage through User Research—Without a Total Redesign,” Weave: Journal of Library User Experience 1, no. 1 (2014), https://doi.org/10.3998/weave.12535642.0001.102.
Andy Priestner, “Approaching Maturity? UX Adoption in Libraries,” in User Experience in Libraries: Yearbook 2017, ed. Andy Priestner (Cambridge, England: UX in Libraries, 2017), 1–8.
Asha L. Hegde, Patricia M. Boucher, and Allison D. Lavelle, “How Do You Work? Understanding User Needs for Responsive Study Space Design,” College & Research Libraries 79, no. 7 (2018), https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.79.7.895.
Bruce Massis, “The User Experience (UX) in Libraries,” Information and Learning Sciences 119, no. 3/4 (March 12, 2018): 241–44, https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-12-2017-0132.
Coral Sheldon-Hess, “UX, Consideration, and a CMMI-Based Model,” Coral Sheldon-Hess Blog (blog), 2013, https://web.archive.org/web/20190117144529/http://www.sheldon-hess.org/coral/2013/07/ux-consideration-cmmi/.
Craig M. MacDonald, “‘It Takes a Village’: On UX Librarianship and Building UX Capacity in Libraries,” Journal of Library Administration 57, no. 2 (February 17, 2017): 194–214, https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2016.1232942.
Craig M. MacDonald, “User Experience Librarians: User Advocates, User Researchers, Usability Evaluators, or All of the Above?,” Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology 52, no. 1 (2015): 1–10, https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.2015.145052010055.
Current index and classification list available from http://www.carnegieclassifications.iu.edu/classification_descriptions/size_setting.php.
Daniel Pshock, “Results from the 2017 Library User Experience Survey,” Designing for Digital, March 6, 2018, https://web.archive.org/web/20190829163234/https://d4d2018.sched.com/event/DM8H/d16-02-results-from-the-2017-library-user-experience-survey.
Daniel Pshock, “The User Experience of Libraries: Serving The Common Good,” User Experience 17, no. 2 (2017), https://web.archive.org/web/20190822051708/http://uxpamagazine.org/the-user-experience-of-libraries/.
David Liddle, “Best Value—The Impact on Libraries: Practical Steps in Demonstrating Best Value,” Library Management 20, no. 4 (June 1, 1999): 206–14, https://doi.org/10.1108/01435129910268982.
Delroy L. Paulhus, “Socially Desirable Responding: The Evolution of a Construct,” in The Role of Constructs in Psychological and Educational Measurement (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2002), 49–69.
Geoff Cumming, Understanding the New Statistics: Effect Sizes, Confidence Intervals, and Meta-Analysis (New York: Routledge, 2012), 26.
IDEO, The Field Guide to Human-Centered Design (San Francisco: IDEO, 2015).
Jakob Nielsen, “Corporate UX Maturity: Stages 1–4,” Nielsen Norman Group, 2006, https://web.archive.org/web/20190709231540/https://www.nngroup.com/articles/ux-maturity-stages-1-4/.
Jakob Nielsen, “Corporate UX Maturity: Stages 5–8,” Nielsen Norman Group, 2006, https://web.archive.org/web/20190709231533/https://www.nngroup.com/articles/ux-maturity-stages-5-8/.
Joe J. Marquez and Annie Downey, Getting Started in Service Design: A How-To-Do-It Manual for Librarians (Chicago: American Library Association, 2017).
Joe Marquez and Annie Downey, Library Service Design: A LITA Guide to Holistic Assessment, Insight, and Improvement (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2016).
Juan Carlos Rodriguez, Kristin Meyer, and Brian Merry, “Understand, Identify, and Respond: The New Focus of Access Services,” portal: Libraries and the Academy 17, no. 2 (April 8, 2017): 321–35, https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2017.0019.
Klaus Krippendorff, Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology, 3rd edition (Los Angeles: SAGE, 2012).
Nikki Anderson, “UX Maturity: How to Grow User Research in Your Organization,” Medium, May 1, 2019, https://medium.com/researchops-community/ux-maturity-how-to-grow-user-research-in-your-organization-848715c3543.
Paul D. Allison, Multiple Regression: A Primer (Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge, 1999), 6.
Peter Bruce and Andrew Bruce, “Regression and Prediction,” in Practical Statistics for Data Scientists: 50 Essential Concepts (Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media, 2017).
Rachel Fleming-May et al., “Experience Assessment: Designing an Innovative Curriculum for Assessment and UX Professionals,” Performance Measurement and Metrics 19, no. 1 (December 15, 2017): 30–39, https://doi.org/10.1108/PMM-09-2017-0036.
Rachel Ivy Clarke, “Design Thinking for Design Librarians: Rethinking Art and Design Librarianship,” in The Handbook of Art and Design Librarianship, ed. Paul Glassman and Judy Dyki, 2nd edition (Chicago: ALA Neal-Schuman, 2017), 41–49.
Rachel Ivy Clarke, “How We Done It Good: Research through Design as a Legitimate Methodology for Librarianship,” Library & Information Science Research 40, no. 3 (July 1, 2018): 255–61, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2018.09.007.
Rachel Ivy Clarke, “Toward a Design Epistemology for Librarianship,” The Library Quarterly 88, no. 1 (2018): 41–59, https://doi.org/10.1086/694872.
Rachel Ivy Clarke, Satyen Amonkar, and Ann Rosenblad, “Design Thinking and Methods in Library Practice and Graduate Library Education,” Journal of Librarianship and Information Science (September 8, 2019), https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000619871989.
Scott W. H. Young and Celina Brownotter, “Toward a More Just Library: Participatory Design with Native American Students,” Weave: Journal of Library User Experience 1, no. 9 (2018), https://doi.org/10.3998/weave.12535642.0001.901.
Scott W. H. Young, Zoe Chao, and Adam Chandler, “Data From: User Experience Methods and Maturity in Academic Libraries,” Distributed by Dryad, https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.jwstqjq5d.
Shannon Marie Robinson, “Critical Design in Librarianship: Visual and Narrative Exploration for Critical Praxis,” The Library Quarterly 89, no. 4 (October 1, 2019): 348–61, https://doi.org/10.1086/704965.
Susan Farrell, “UX Research Cheat Sheet,” Nielsen Norman Group, February 12, 2017, https://web.archive.org/web/20190828224735/https://www.nngroup.com/articles/ux-research-cheat-sheet/.
Tomer Sharon, “UX Research Maturity Model,” Prototypr (blog), 2016, https://web.archive.org/web/20190829163113/https://blog.prototypr.io/ux-research-maturity-model-9e9c6c0edb83?gi=c462f7ac4600.
Zoe Chao, “Rethinking User Experience Studies in Libraries: The Story of UX Café,” Weave: Journal of Library User Experience 2, no. 2 (2019), https://doi.org/10.3998/weave.12535642.0002.203.
Copyright (c) 2020 Scott W. H. Young, Zoe Chao, and Adam Chandler
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.