Filling the Gap in Database Usability

Putting Vendor Accessibility Compliance to the Test

Abstract

Library database vendors often revamp simpler interfaces of their database platforms with script-enriched interfaces to make them more attractive. Sadly, these enhancements often overlook users who rely on assistive technology, leaving electronic content difficult for this user base despite the potential of electronic materials to be easier for them to access and read than print materials. Even when providers are somewhat aware of this user group's needs there are questions about the effect of their efforts to date and whether accessibility documentation from them can be relied upon. This study examines selected vendors’ VPAT reports (Voluntary Product Accessibility Template) through a manual assessment of their database platforms to determine their overall accessibility.

Author Biography

Samuel Kent Willis, Wichita State University
I am Assistant Professor and Technology Development Librarian at Wichita State University, and part of the Library Technologies Unit within the University Libraries.

References

A. J. Blechner, “Improving Usability of Legal Research Databases for Users with Print Disabilities,” Legal Reference Services Quarterly, 34, no. 2 (2000): 139, https://doi.org/10.1080/0270319X.2015.1048647.

Christina Mune and Ann Agee, “Are E-books for Everyone? An Evaluation of Academic E-book Platforms’ Accessibility Features,” Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship 28, no. 3 (2016): 181, https://doi.org/10.1080/1941126X.2016.1200927.

Jennifer Horwath, “Evaluating Opportunities for Expanded Information Access: A Study of the Accessibility of Four Online Databases,” Library Hi Tech 20, no. 2 (2002): 199, https://doi.org/10.1108/07378830210432561.

Jennifer Tatomir and Joan C. Durrance, “Overcoming the Information Gap: Measuring the Accessibility of Library Databases to Adaptive Technology Users,” Library Hi Tech 28, no. 4 (2010): 581.

Jonathan Lazar, Daniel F. Goldstein, and Anne Taylor, Ensuring Digital Accessibility through Process and Policy (Amsterdam: Morgan Kaufmann/Elsevier, 2015), 150.

Kelly Dermody and Norda Majekodunmi, “Online Databases and the Research Experience for University Students with Print Disabilities,” Library Hi Tech 20, no. 1 (2011): 150, https://doi.org/10.1108/07378831111116976.

Laura DeLancey, “Assessing the Accuracy of Vendor-supplied Accessibility Documentation,” Library Hi Tech 33, no. 1 (2015): 104, https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-08-2014-0077.

Accessibility of Web Information and Services of State and Local Government Entities, 81 Fed. Reg. 28,658 (May 9, 2016) (to be codified at 28 CFR pt. 35).

Sarah George, Ellie Clement, and Grace Hudson, “Auditing the Accessibility of Electronic Resources,” SCONUL Focus, 62 (2014): 16.

Suzanne L. Byerley and Mary Beth Chambers, “Accessibility and Usability of Web-based Library Databases for Non-Visual Users,” Library Hi Tech, 20, no. 2 (2002) 177, https://doi.org/10.1108/07378831111116976.

Published
2020-12-21
How to Cite
Willis, S. K., & O’Reilly, F. (2020). Filling the Gap in Database Usability. Information Technology and Libraries, 39(4). https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v39i4.11977
Section
Articles