At the Click of a Button
Assessing the User Experience of Open Access Finding Tools
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v39i2.12041Abstract
A number of browser extension tools have emerged in the past decade aimed at helping information seekers find open versions of scholarly articles when they hit a paywall, including Open Access Button, Lazy Scholar, Kopernio, and Unpaywall. While librarians have written numerous reviews of these products, no one has yet conducted a usability study on these tools. This article details a usability study involving six undergraduate students and six faculty at a large public research university in the United States. Participants were tasked with installing each of the four tools as well as trying them out on three test articles. Both students and faculty tended to favor simple, clean design elements and straightforward functionality that enabled them to use the tools with limited instruction. Participants familiar with other browser extensions gravitated towards tools like Open Access Button, whereas those less experienced with other extensions preferred tools that load automatically, such as Unpaywall.
References
Amalia Beisler, Rosalind Bucy, and Ann Medaille, “Streaming Video Database Features: What Do Faculty and Students Really Want?,” Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship 31, no. 1 (January 2, 2019): 14–30, https://doi.org/10.1080/1941126X.2018.1562602.
Ballard, “Two New Services Aim to Improve Access to Scholarly PDFs”.
Barbara A. Blummer, “A Literature Review of Academic Library Web Page Studies,” Journal of Web Librarianship 1, no. 1 (June 21, 2007): 45–64, https://doi.org/10.1300/J502v01n01_04.
Barbara Quint, “Must Buy? Maybe Not,” Information Today 34, no. 5 (June 2017): 17.
Bonnie Brubaker Imler, Kathryn Rebecca Garcia, and Nina Clements, “Are Reference Pop-up Widgets Welcome or Annoying? A Usability Study,” Reference Services Review 44, no. 3 (2016): 282–91, https://doi.org/10.1108/RSR-11-2015-0049.
Chris Bulock, “Delivering Open,” Serials Review 43, no. 3–4 (October 2, 2017): 268–70, https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2017.1385128.
David Nicholas et al., “Where and How Early Career Researchers Find Scholarly Information,” Learned Publishing 30, no. 1 (January 1, 2017): 19–29, https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1087.
E. E. Gering, “Review: Unpaywall,” May 24, 2017, https://eegering.wordpress.com/2017/05/24/review-unpaywall/.
Eleanor I. Cook and Joe McArthur, “What Is Open Access Button? An Interview with Joe McArthur,” The Serials Librarian 73, no. 3–4 (November 17, 2017): 208–10, https://doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2017.1391152.
Imler, Garcia, and Clements, “Are Reference Pop-up Widgets Welcome or Annoying,” 287–9.
Kenneth C. Haggerty and Rachel E. Scott, “Do, or Do Not, Make Them Think?: A Usability Study of an Academic Library Search Box,” Journal of Web Librarianship 13, no. 4 (October 2, 2019): 296–310, https://doi.org/10.1080/19322909.2019.1684223.
Kerry Dhakal, “Unpaywall,” Journal of the Medical Library Association 107, no. 2 (April 15, 2019): 286–88, https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2019.650.
Matthew B. Hoy, “Kopernio,” Journal of the Medical Library Association 107, no. 4 (October 1, 2019): 632–33, https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2019.805.
Michael Rodriguez, “Open Access Button,” Technical Services Quarterly 36, no. 1 (January 2, 2019): 101–2, https://doi.org/10.1080/07317131.2018.1532043.
Michael Rodriguez, “Unpaywall,” Technical Services Quarterly 36, no. 2 (April 3, 2019): 216–17, https://doi.org/10.1080/07317131.2019.1585002.
Michaela D. Willi Hooper, “Product Review: Unpaywall [Chrome & Firefox Browser Extension],” Journal of Librarianship & Scholarly Communication 5 (January 2017): 1–3, https://doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.2190.
Registry of Open Repositories, “Welcome to the Registry of Open Access Repositories - Registry of Open Access Repositories,” 2019, http://roar.eprints.org/.
Ritch Macefield, “How to Specify the Participant Group Size for Usability Studies: A Practitioner’s Guide,” Journal of Usability Studies 5, no. 1 (2009): 34–5.
Robert A. Virzi, “Refining the Test Phase of Usability Evaluation: How Many Subjects Is Enough?,” Human Factors 34, no. 4 (August 1, 1992): 457–68, https://doi.org/10.1177/001872089203400407.
Ryan Regier, “How Much Are We Undercounting Open Access? A Plea for Better and Open Metadata.,” A Way of Happening (blog), May 1, 2019, https://awayofhappening.wordpress.com/2019/05/01/how-much-are-we-undercounting-open-access-a-plea-for-better-and-open-metadata/.
Sarah Guay, Lola Rudin, and Sue Reynolds, “Testing, Testing: A Usability Case Study at University of Toronto Scarborough Library,” Library Management 40, no. 1/2 (January 1, 2019): 88–97, https://doi.org/10.1108/LM-10-2017-0107.
Teresa Auch Schultz et al., “Assessing the Effectiveness of Open Access Finding Tools,” Information Technology and Libraries (Online) 38, no. 3 (September 2019): 82–90, https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v38i3.11009.
Terezita Overduin, “‘Like a Robot’: Designing Library Websites for New and Returning Users,” Journal of Web Librarianship 13, no. 2 (April 3, 2019): 112–26, https://doi.org/10.1080/19322909.2019.1593912.
Terry Ballard, “Two New Services Aim to Improve Access to Scholarly PDFs,” Information Today 34, no. 9 (November 2017): Cover-29.
World Leaders in Research-Based User Experience, “How Many Test Users in a Usability Study?,” Nielsen Norman Group, accessed December 24, 2019, https://www.nngroup.com/articles/how-many-test-users/.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Elena Azadbakht and Teresa Schultz
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors that submit to Information Technology and Libraries agree to the Copyright Notice.
