Measuring the Impact of Digital Heritage Collections Using Google Scholar
This study aimed to measure the impact of digital heritage collections by analysing the citations received in scholarly outputs. Google Scholar was used to retrieve the scholarly outputs citing Memòria Digital de Catalunya (MDC), a cooperative, open-access repository containing digitized collections related to Catalonia and its heritage. The number of documents citing MDC has grown steadily since the creation of the repository in 2006. Most citing documents are scholarly outputs in the form of articles, proceedings and monographs, and academic theses and dissertations. Citing documents mainly pertain to the humanities and the social sciences and are in local languages. The most cited MDC collection contains digitized ancient Catalan periodicals. The study shows that Google Scholar is a suitable tool for providing evidence of the scholarly impact of digital heritage collections. Google Scholar indexes the full-text of documents, facilitating the retrieval of citations inserted in the text or in sections that are not the final list of references. It also indexes document types, such as theses and dissertations, which contain a significant share of the citations to digital heritage collections.
Alberto Martín-Martín et al., “Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A Systematic Comparison of Citations in 252 Subject Categories,” Journal of Informetrics 12, no 4 (November 2018): 1160–77, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.09.002.
Donghee Sinn, “Impact of Digital Archival Collections on Historical Research,” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 63, no. 8 (August 2012): 1521, https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22650.
“EU Member States Sign Up to Cooperate on Digitising Cultural Heritage,” European Commission, last updated April 24, 2020, https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/eu-member-states-sign-cooperate-digitising-cultural-heritage.
Emily Frieda Shaw, “Making Digitization Count: Assessing the Value and Impact of Cultural Heritage Digitization,” Archiving 2016 Final Program and Proceedings (Springfield, VA: Society for Imaging Science and Technology, 2016), 197, https://doi.org/10.2352/issn.2168-3204.2016.1.0.197.
LIBER, “Europe's Digital Humanities Landscape: A Report from LIBER's Digital Humanities & Digital Cultural Heritage Working Group,” (2017), 28, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3247286.
Paromita Biswas and Joel Marchesoni, “Analyzing Digital Collections Entrances: What Gets Used and Why It Matters,” Information Technology and Libraries 35, no. 4 (2016): 19–34, https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v35i4.9446.
Vivien Petras and Juliane Stiller, “A Decade of Evaluating Europeana—Constructs, Contexts, Methods & Criteria,” in Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries: 21st International Conference on Theory and Practice, eds. Jaap Kamps et al. (Cham: Springer, 2017), 241, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67008-9_19.
Copyright (c) 2020 Ángel Borrego
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.