Algorithmic Literacy and the Role for Libraries

  • Michael Ridley University of Guelph
  • Danica Pawlick-Potts Western University


Artificial intelligence (AI) is powerful, complex, ubiquitous, often opaque, sometimes invisible, and increasingly consequential in our everyday lives. Navigating the effects of AI as well as utilizing it in a responsible way requires a level of awareness, understanding, and skill that is not provided by current digital literacy or information literacy regimes. Algorithmic literacy addresses these gaps. In arguing for a role for libraries in algorithmic literacy, the authors provide a working definition, a pressing need, a pedagogical strategy, and two specific contributions that are unique to libraries.

Author Biographies

Michael Ridley, University of Guelph
Librarian, McLaughlin Library
Danica Pawlick-Potts, Western University

PhD Candidate, Faculty of Information and Media Studies


“2019 Edelman AI Survey,” Edelman, 2019,

Alejandro Barredo Arrieta et al., “Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AI,” ArXiv:1910.10045 [Cs], 2019,

Alfred Thomas Bauer and Ebrahim Mohseni Ahooei, “Rearticulating Internet Literacy,” Cyberspace Studies 2, no. 1 (2018): 29–53,

Alison J. Head, Barbara Fister, and Margy MacMillan, “Information Literacy in the Age of Algorithms: Student Experiences with News and Information, and the Need for Change” (Project Information Literacy, 2020), 41,

Allan Martin and Jan Grudziecki, “DigEuLit: Concepts and Tools for Digital Literacy Development,” Innovation in Teaching and Learning in Information and Computer Sciences 5, no. 4 (2006): 249–67,

Altexsoft, “Comparing Machine Learning as a Service: Amazon, Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud AI, IBM Watson,” Data Science (blog), September 27, 2019,

Andreas Dengel and Ute Heuer, “A Curriculum of Computational Thinking as a Central Idea of Information & Media Literacy,” in Proceedings of the 13th Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education (WiPSCE’18) October 4-6, 2018, Potsdam, Germany (New York: ACM, 2018),

Annemaree Lloyd, “Chasing Frankenstein’s Monster: Information Literacy in the Black Box Society,” Journal of Documentation 75, no. 6 (2019): 1476,

Ashraf Abdul et al., “Trends and Trajectories for Explainable, Accountable, and Intelligible Systems: An HCI Research Agenda,” in Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’18 (New York: ACM, 2018), 582:1–582:18,

Association of College and University Libraries, “Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education,” 2015,

B. Alexander, S. Adams Becker, and M. Cummins, “Digital Literacy: An NMC Horizon Project Strategic Brief” (Austin, TX: The New Media Consortium, 2016),

Betual C. Czerkawski and Eugene W. Lyman III, “Exploring Issues about Computational Thinking in Higher Education,” TechTrends 59, no. 2 (2015): 57–65.

Bryce Goodman and Seth Flaxman, “European Union Regulations on Algorithmic Decision Making and a ‘Right to Explanation,’” AI Magazine 38, no. 3 (2017): 50–57,

“Canada’s AI Imperative: From Predictions to Prosperity” (Toronto: Deloitte, 2019), 16,

Canadian Federation of Library Associations, “Artificial Intelligence and Intellectual Freedom: Key Policy Concerns for Canadian Libraries” (Ottawa: CFLA, 2018),

Catherine Coleman, “Artificial Intelligence and the Library of the Future, Revisited,” Digital Library Blog (blog), November 3, 2017,

Cathy O’Neil, Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy (New York: Crown, 2016).

Daniel Zeng, “From Computational Thinking to AI Thinking,” IEEE Intelligent Systems (November/December, 2013), 2–4.

DARPA, “Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)” (Arlington, VA: DARPA, 2016),

David Bawden, “Information and Digital Literacies: A Review of Concepts,” Journal of Documentation 57, no. 2 (2001): 233.

Duri Long and Brian Magerko, “What Is AI Literacy? Competencies and Design Considerations,” in Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’20 (Honolulu, HI: Association for Computing Machinery, 2020), 1–16,

Ed Finn, “Algorithm of the Enlightenment,” Issues in Science and Technology 33, no. 3 (2017): 25.

Ed Finn, What Algorithms Want: Imagination in the Age of Computing (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2017), 2.

Edward Greenspon and Taylor Owen, “Democracy Divided: Countering Disinformation and Hate in the Digital Public Sphere” (Ottawa: Public Policy Forum, 2018), 19,

European Union, “Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016,” 2016,

Evelyn Stiller and Cathie LeBlanc, “From Computer Literacy to Cyber-Literacy,” Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges 21, no. 6 (2006): 4–13.

Finland, “Work in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: Four Perspectives on Economy, Employment, Skills and Ethics” (Helsinki: Ministry of Economic Affairs and Employment, 2018),

Frank Pasquale, The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2015).

George Steiner, “School Terms: Redefining Literacy for the Digital Age,” Lapham’s Quarterly 1, no. 4 (2008): 198.

Jason Clark, “Building Competencies around Algorithmic Awareness” (Washington, DC: Code4Lib, 2018),

Jason Clark, Algorithmic Awareness (2018; repr., GitHub, 2020),

Jason Clark, Lisa Janicke Hinchliffe, and Scott Young, “Unpacking the Algorithms That Shape Our UX” (Washington, DC: IMLS, 2017),

Jeannette Wing, “Computational Thinking, 10 Years Later,” Communications of the ACM 59, no. 7 (2016): 10,

Jeannette Wing, “Computational Thinking,” Communications of the ACM 49, no. 3 (2006): 35.

Jenna Burrell, “How the Machine ‘Thinks’: Understanding Opacity in Machine Learning Algorithms,” Big Data & Society 3, no. 1 (2016),

Jesús Moreno-León and Marcos Román-González, “On Computational Thinking as a Universal Skill,” in IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain: IEEE, 2018), 1684–89.

Jos de Mul and Bibi van den Berg, “Remote Control: Human Autonomy in the Age of Computer-Mediated Agency,” in Law, Human Agency, and Autonomic Computing, ed. Mireille Hildebrandt and Antoinette Rouvroy (Abingdon: Routledge, 2011), 58.

Julia Angwin et al., “Machine Bias,” ProPublica, May 23, 2016,

Karen Nicholson, “Information into Action? Reflections on (Critical) Practice” (Workshop on Instruction in Library Use (WILU), University of Ottawa, 2018), 7–8,

Lee Rainie and Janna Anderson, “Code-Dependent: Pros and Cons of the Algorithmic Age” (Pew Research Center, February 2017),

Loanne Snavely and Natasha Cooper, “The Information Literacy Debate,” Journal of Academic Librarianship 23, no. 1 (1997): 9–14,

Marcos Román-González, Juan-Carlos Pérez-González, and Carmen Jiménez-Fernández, “Which Cognitive Abilities Underlie Computational Thinking? Criterion Validity of the Computational Thinking Test,” Computers in Human Behavior 72 (2017): 678–91,

Matt Turek, “Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)” (Arlington, VA: DARPA, 2016),

Michael Ridley, “Explainable Artificial Intelligence,” Research Library Issues, no. 299 (2019): 28–46,

Motahhare Eslami et al., “First I ‘Like’ It, Then I Hide It: Folk Theories of Social Feeds,” in Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’16 (San Jose, CA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2016), 2371–82,

Nicholas Diakopoulos, “Algorithmic Accountability Reporting: On the Investigation of Black Boxes” (New York: Tow Center for Digital Journalism, Columbia University, 2014), 2,

Nick Seaver, “Algorithms as Culture: Some Tactics for the Ethnography of Algorithm Systems,” Big Data & Society 4 (2017): 10,

Nick Seaver, “What Should an Anthropology of Algorithms Do?” (American Anthropological Association, Chicago, 2013), 1–2,

Paul T. Jaeger et al., “The Intersection of Public Policy and Public Access: Digital Divides, Digital Literacy, Digital Inclusion, and Public Libraries,” Public Library Quarterly 31, no. 1 (2012): 1,

Peter J. Denning and Matti Tedre, Computational Thinking (Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 2019).

PriceWaterhouseCooper, “Sizing the Prize: What’s the Real Value of AI for Your Business and How Can You Capitalise?,” 2017,

R. David Lankes, “Decoding AI and Libraries,” R. David Lankes (blog), July 3, 2019,

Rob Kitchin, “Thinking Critically about and Researching Algorithms,” Information, Communication & Society 20, no. 1 (2017): 18,

Rosanne Cordell, “Information Literacy and Digital Literacy: Competing or Complementary?,” Communications in Information Literacy 7, no. 2 (2013): 177–83,

Ruha Benjamin, Race after Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code (Polity Press, 2019).

Ryan Cordell, “Machine Learning + Libraries: A Report on the State of the Field” (Washington DC: Library of Congress, 2020), 31,

Safiya Noble, Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism (New York: New York University Press, 2018), 1.

Sarah Gretter and Aman Yadav, “Computational Thinking and Media & Information Literacy: An Integrated Approach to Teaching Twenty-First Century Skills,” TechTrends 60 (2016): 510–16,

Sayamindu Dasgupta and Benjamin Mako Hill, “Designing for Critical Algorithmic Literacies,” ArXiv:2008.01719 [Cs], 2020,

Scott Lash, “Power after Hegemony: Cultural Studies in Mutation?,” Theory, Culture & Society 24, no. 3 (2007): 71,

Sharin Rawhiya Jacob and Mark Warschauer, “Computational Thinking and Literacy,” Journal of Computer Science Integration 1, no. 1 (2018): 3,

Shuchi Grover and Roy Pea, “Computational Thinking in K–12: A Review of the State of the Field,” Educational Researcher 42, no. 1 (2013): 38–43,

Sun-Ha Hong, Technologies of Speculation: The Limits of Knowledge in a Data-Driven Society (New York: New York University Press, 2020), 2.

Sylvia Scribner and Michael Cole, The Psychology of Literacy, ACLS Humanities E-Book (Series) (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1981), 99.

Taina Bucher, “The Algorithmic Imaginary: Exploring the Ordinary Affects of Facebook Algorithms,” Information, Communication & Society 20, no. 1 (2017): 42,

Taina Bucher, If . . . Then: Algorithmic Power and Politics (New York: Oxford University Press, 2018), 20.

Tanya Kant, Making It Personal: Algorithmic Personalization, Identify, and Everyday Life (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020), 152.

Tarleton Gillespie, “The Relevance of Algorithms,” in Media Technologies: Essays on Communication, Materiality, and Society, ed. Tarleton Gillespie, Pablo J. Boczkowski, and Kirsten A. Foot (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2014), 184.

Thomas H. Cormen et al., Introduction to Algorithms, 3rd ed. (Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 2009), 13.

Thomas Padilla, Responsible Operations. Data Science, Machine Learning, and AI in Libraries (Dublin, OH: OCLC Research, 2019), 10,

Time Dutton, “Building an AI World: Report on National and Regional AI Strategies” (Toronto: CIFAR, 2018),

Ting-Chia Hsu, Shao-Chen Chang, and Yu-Ting Hung, “How to Learn and How to Teach Computational Thinking: Suggestions Based on a Review of the Literature,” Computers & Education 126 (2018): 296–310,

“ULC Snapshot: Artificial Intelligence,” Urban Libraries Council Weekly Newsletter, July 18, 2018.

Virginia Eubanks, Automating Inequity: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 2018).

“What Consumers Really Think about AI: A Global Study,” Pega, 2019,

Wojciech Samek and Klaus-Robert Muller, “Towards Explainable Artificial Intelligence,” in Explainable AI: Interpreting, Explaining and Visualizing Deep Learning, ed. Wojciech Samek et al., 2019., Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 11700 (Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019), 5–22.

Yoav Shohman et al., “AI Index 2017 Report” (Stanford, CA: Human-Centered AI Initiative, Stanford University, 2017),

Z. Katai, “The Challenge of Promoting Algorithmic Thinking of Both Sciences- and Humanities-Oriented Learners,” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 31, no. 4 (2015): 287–99,

How to Cite
Ridley, M., & Pawlick-Potts, D. (2021). Algorithmic Literacy and the Role for Libraries. Information Technology and Libraries, 40(2).