Mitigating Bias in Metadata

A Use Case Using Homosaurus Linked Data


Controlled vocabularies used in cultural heritage organizations (galleries, libraries, archives, and museums) are a helpful way to standardize terminology but can also result in misrepresentation or exclusion of systemically marginalized groups. Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) is one example of a widely used yet problematic controlled vocabulary for subject headings. In some cases, systemically marginalized groups are creating controlled vocabularies that better reflect their terminology. When a widely used vocabulary like LCSH and a controlled vocabulary from a marginalized community are both available as linked data, it is possible to incorporate the terminology from the marginalized community as an overlay or replacement for outdated or absent terms from more widely used vocabularies. This paper provides a use case for examining how the Homosaurus, an LGBTQ+ linked data controlled vocabulary, can provide an augmented and updated search experience to mitigate bias within a system that only uses LCSH for subject headings.


Alexis A. Antracoli et al., Anti-Racist Description Resources (Philadelphia, PA: Archives for Black Lives in Philadelphia, 2019), i,

Amelia Koford, “How Disability Studies Scholars Interact with Subject Headings,” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 52, no. 4 (2014),

Avril Johnson Madison and Dorothy Porter Wesley, “Dorothy Burnett Porter Wesley: Enterprising Steward of Black Culture,” Public Historian 17, no. 1 (Winter 1995): 25,

BC First Nations Subject Headings (Vancouver, BC: Xwi7xwa Library First Nations House of Learning, March 2, 2009),

Catelynne Sahadath, “Classifying the Margins: Using Alternative Classification Schemes to Empower Diverse and Marginalized Users,” Feliciter 59, no. 3 (June 2013): 16.

Dee Michel, ed., Gay Studies Thesaurus, rev. ed. (Urbana, IL, 1990).

Diana K. Wakimoto, Debra L. Hansen, and Christine Bruce, “The Case of LLACE: Challenges, Triumphs, and Lessons of a Community Archives,” American Archivist 76, no. 2 (Fall/Winter 2013),

Dorothy Berry, “Digitizing and Enhancing Description Across Collections to Make African American Materials More Discoverable on Umbra Search African American History,” The Design for Diversity Learning Toolkit, Northeastern University Libraries, August 2, 2018,

Emily Drabinski, “Queering the Catalog: Queer Theory and the Politics of Correction,” Library Quarterly: Information, Community, Policy 83, no. 2 (April 2013),

Freeda Brook, David Ellenwood, and Althea Eannace Lazzaro, “In Pursuit of Antiracist Social Justice: Denaturalizing Whiteness in the Academic Library,” Library Trends 64, no. 2 (Fall 2015): 259,

“Glossary of Disability Terms,” North Carolina Council on Developmental Disabilities, accessed March 8, 2021,

Holly Tomren, “Classification, Bias, and American Indian Materials” (San Jose State University, 2003),

Hope A. Olson and Dennis B. Ward, “Feminist Locales in Dewey’s Landscape: Mapping a Marginalized Knowledge Domain,” in Knowledge Organization for Information Retrieval: Proceedings of the Sixth International Study Conference on Classification Research (The Hague, Netherlands: International Federation for Information Documentation, 1997), 129.

Hope A. Olson, “Mapping Beyond Dewey’s Boundaries: Constructing Classificatory Space for Marginalized Knowledge Domains,” Library Trends 47, no. 2 (Fall 1998): 238.

J. L. Colbert [], “Patron-Driven Subject Access: How Librarians Can Mitigate That ‘Power to Name’,” In the Library with the Lead Pipe, November 15, 2017,

Janet Sims-Wood, Dorothy Porter Wesley at Howard University: Building a Legacy of Black History (Charleston, SC: The History Press, 2014), 39.

Kristen Hogan, “‘Breaking Secrets’ in the Catalog: Proposing the Black Queer Studies Collection at the University of Texas at Austin,” Progressive Librarian 34 (2010),

“Mission, History, Editorial Board,” Homosaurus Vocabulary Site, accessed March 2, 2021,

Monica Martens, “Creating a Supplemental Thesaurus to LCSH for a Specialized Collection: The Experience of the National Indian Law Library,” Law Library Journal 98, no. 2 (Spring 2006).

SAC Working Group, “Report of the SAC Working Group on Alternatives to LCSH ‘Illegal Aliens,’” American Library Association Institutional Repository, submitted June 19, 2020,

Sara A. Howard and Steven A. Knowlton, “Browsing through Bias: The Library of Congress Classification and Subject Headings for African American Studies and LGBTQIA Studies,” Library Trends 67, no. 1 (Summer 2018),

“Search in the Women’s Thesaurus,” Atria—Institute on gender equality and women’s history, accessed March 8, 2021,

Sharon Farnel et al., “Rethinking Representation: Indigenous Peoples and Contexts at the University of Alberta Libraries,” International Journal of Information, Diversity, & Inclusion 2, no. 3 (2018),

“SKOS Simple Knowledge Organization System Reference,” W3, published August 18, 2009,

“skos:exactMatch,” SKOS Simple Knowledge Organization System Namespace Document—HTML Variant, 18 August 2009 Recommendation Edition, W3, last modified August 6, 2011,

Zita Cristina Nunes, “Cataloging Black Knowledge: How Dorothy Porter Assembled and Organized a Premier Africana Research Collection,” Perspectives on History: The News Magazine of the American Historical Association (November 20, 2018),

How to Cite
Hardesty, J., & Nolan, A. (2021). Mitigating Bias in Metadata. Information Technology and Libraries, 40(3).