Product Ownership of a Legacy Institutional Repository

A Case Study on Revitalizing an Aging Service

  • Mikala Narlock University of Notre Dame
  • Don Brower University of Notre Dame

Abstract

Many academic libraries have developed and/or purchased digital systems over the years, including digital collection platforms, institutional repositories, and other online tools on which users depend. At Hesburgh Libraries, as with other institutions, some of these systems have aged without strong guidance and resulted in stale services and technology. This case study will explore the lengthy process of stewarding an aging service that satisfies critical external needs. Starting with a brief literature review and institutional context, the authors will examine how the current product owners have embraced the role of maintainers, charting a future direction by defining a clear vision for the service, articulating firm boundaries, and prioritizing small changes. The authors will conclude by reflecting on lessons learned and discussing potential future work, both at the institutional and professional level.

References

Bethany Nowviskie, “On Capacity and Care,” October 4, 2015, http://nowviskie.org/2015/on-capacity-and-care/.

Carly Dearborn, Amy Barton, and Neal Harmeyer, “The Purdue University Research Repository: HUBzero Customization for Dataset Publication and Digital Preservation,” OCLC Systems & Services, February 1, 2014, https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/lib_fsdocs/62.

Carolyn Ten Holter, “The Repository, the Researcher, and the REF: ‘It’s Just Compliance, Compliance, Compliance’,” Journal of Academic Librarianship 46, no. 1 (January 1, 2020): 102079, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2019.102079.

Clifford Lynch, “Institutional Repositories: Essential Infrastructure for Scholarship in the Digital Age,” portal: Libraries and the Academy 3 (April 1, 2003): 327–36, https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2003.0039.

Clifford Lynch, “Updating the Agenda for Academic Libraries and Scholarly Communications,” College & Research Libraries 78, no. 2 (February 2017): 126–30, https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.78.2.126.

Dale Askey and Jennifer Askey, “One Library, Two Cultures” (Library Juice Press, 2017), https://macsphere.mcmaster.ca/handle/11375/22281.

Deborah E. Keil, “Research Data Needs from Academic Libraries: The Perspective of a Faculty Researcher,” Journal of Library Administration 54, no. 3 (April 3, 2014): 233–40, https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2014.915168.

Diane Walker, “Hesburgh/Snite Mellon Grant,” October 31, 2018, https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/CUSMX.

Don Brower et al., “On Institutional Repositories, ‘Beyond the Repository Services,’ their Content, Maintainers, and Stakeholders,” Against the Grain, 32 (1), https://against-the-grain.com/2020/04/v321-atg-special-report-on-institutional-repositories-beyond-the-repository-services-their-content-maintainers-and-stakeholders/.

Dorothea Salo, “Innkeeper at the Roach Motel,” December 11, 2007, https://minds.wisconsin.edu/handle/1793/22088.

Hrafnhildur Sif Sverrisdottir, Helgi Thor Ingason, and Haukur Ingi Jonasson, “The Role of the Product Owner in Scrum-Comparison between Theory and Practices,” in “Selected Papers from the 27th IPMA (International Project Management Association), World Congress, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 2013,” special issue, Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 119 (March 19, 2014): 257–67, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.030.

J. J. Branin, “Institutional Repositories,” in Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science, ed. M. A. Drake (Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis Group, 2005): 237–48.

James Powell, Martin Klein, and Herbert Van de Sompel, “Autoload: A Pipeline for Expanding the Holdings of an Institutional Repository Enabled by ResourceSync,” Code4Lib Journal, no. 36 (April 20, 2017), https://journal.code4lib.org/articles/12427.

Jihyun Kim, “Motivations of Faculty Self-Archiving in Institutional Repositories,” Journal of Academic Librarianship 37, no. 3 (May 1, 2011): 246–54, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2011.02.017.

Rafia Mirza and Maura Seale, “Dudes Code, Ladies Coordinate: Gendered Labor in Digital Scholarship,” October 22, 2017, https://osf.io/hj3ks/.

Raym Crow, “The Case for Institutional Repositories: A SPARC Position Paper,” ARL Bimonthly Report 223, August 2002: 7.

Ruth Kitchin Tillman, “Who’s the One Left Saying Sorry? Gender/Tech/Librarianship,” April 6, 2018, https://ruthtillman.com/post/whos-the-one-left-saying-sorry-gender-tech-librarianship/.

Sarah Hare and Jenny Hoops, “Furthering Open: Tips for Crafting an IR Deposit Service,” October 26, 2018, https://scholarworks.iu.edu/dspace/handle/2022/22547.

Soohyung Joo, Darra Hofman, and Youngseek Kim, “Investigation of Challenges in Academic Institutional Repositories: A Survey of Academic Librarians,” Library Hi Tech 37, no. 3 (January 1, 2019): 525–48, https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-12-2017-0266.

Trevor Owens, “The Theory and Craft of Digital Preservation,” LIS Scholarship Archive, July 15, 2017, https://doi.org/10.31229/osf.io/5cpjt.

Published
2021-09-20
How to Cite
Narlock, M., & Brower, D. (2021). Product Ownership of a Legacy Institutional Repository. Information Technology and Libraries, 40(3). https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v40i3.13241
Section
Articles