ResearchGate Metrics’ Behavior and Its Correlation with RG Score and Scopus Indicators

A Combination of Bibliometric and Altmetric Analysis of Scholars in Medical Sciences

  • Saeideh Valizadeh-Haghi Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4326-5215
  • Hamed Nasibi-Sis Department of Medical Library and Information Science, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3340-2738
  • Maryam Shekofteh Department of Medical Library and Information Science, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Shahabedin Rahmatizadeh Department of Health Information Technology and Management, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2429-1642
Keywords: Social Network, ResearchGate, Citation Indicators, Scopus, Altmetric

Abstract

Objective: Social networking sites are appropriate tools for sharing and exposing scientific works to increase citations. The objectives of the present study are to investigate the activity of Iranian scholars in the medical sciences in ResearchGate and to explore the effect of each of the four ResearchGate metrics on the RG score. Moreover, the citation metrics of the faculty members in Scopus and the relationship between these metrics and the RG score were explored.

Methods: The study population included all SBMU faculty members who have profiles in ResearchGate (N=950). The data were collected through ResearchGate and Scopus in January 2021. The Spearman correlation coefficient was applied to examine the relationship between ResearchGate metrics and Scopus indicators as well as to determine the effect of each ResearchGate metric on the RG score.

Results: The findings revealed that the publication sharing metric had the highest correlation (0.918) with the RG score and had the greatest impact on it (p-value <0.001), while the question asking metric showed the lowest correlation (0.11). Moreover, there was a significant relationship between the RG score and Scopus citation metrics (p-value <0.05). Furthermore, all four RG metrics had a positive and significant relationship with Scopus indicators (p-value <0.05), in which the number of shared publications had the highest correlation compared to other RG metrics.

Conclusion: Researchers’ participation in the ResearchGate social network is effective in increasing citation indicators. Therefore, more activity in the ResearchGate social network may have favorable results in improving universities’ ranking.

References

B. S. Lancho Barrantes et al., “Citation Flows in the Zones of Influence of Scientific Collaborations,” Journal of the American Society of Information Science Technology 63, no. 3 (2012): 481–89, https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21682.

Bart Penders, “Ten Simple Rules for Responsible Referencing,” PLoS Computational Biology 14, no. 4 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006036

Brian Kelly, “Can LinkedIn and Academia.edu Enhance Access to Open Repositories?”, Impact of Social Sciences Blog, 2012, https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2012/08/23/linkedin-academia-enhance-access-to-open-repositories/.

CWTS Leiden Ranking 2018, https://www.leidenranking.com/ranking/2018/list.

Dennis H. Lui et al., “Contemporary Engagement with Social Media amongst Hernia Surgery Specialists,” Hernia 21, no. 4 (2017): 509–15, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-017-1609-8

Elena Giglia, “Academic Social Networks: It’s Time to Change the Way We Do Research,” European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 47, no. 2 (2011): 345–49.

Farahnaz Naderbeigi and Alireza Isfandyari-Moghaddam, “Researchers’ Scientific Performance in ResearchGate: The Case of a Technology University,” Library Philosophy & Practice (2018), https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1752.

H. A. Piwowar, R. S. Day, and D. B. Fridsma, “Sharing Detailed Research Data Is Associated with Increased Citation Rate,” PLoS One 2, no. 3 (2007): e308, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000308.

Hamed Nasibi-Sis, Saeideh Valizadeh-Haghi, and Maryam Shekofteh, “ResearchGate Altmetric Scores and Scopus Bibliometric Indicators among Lecturers,” Performance Measurement and Metrics 22 no. 1 (2020):15–24, https://doi.org/10.1108/PMM-04-2020-0020.

Iranian Scientometrics Information Database, https://isid.research.ac.ir/, accessed December 26, 2021.

Maliheh Nikkar, Rahim Alijani, and Hamid Ghazizadeh Khalifeh Mahaleh, “Investigation of the Presence of Surgery Researchers in Research Gate Scientific Network: An Altmetrics Study,” Iranian Journal of Surgery 25, no. 2, (2017): 76–82

Maryam Janmohammadi, Maryam Rahmani, and Zahra Rootan, “Review of RG Indices and Ranking of Researchers in Research Gate: Case Study: Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tehran,” in Proceedings International Interactive Information Retrieval Conference (Tehran, 2017)

Maryam Rahmani et al., “RG Score Compared with H-Index: A Case Study,” Sciences and Techniques of Information Management 4, no. 2 (2018): 61–76, http://stim.qom.ac.ir/article_1139_en.html.

Muhammad Yousuf Ali and Joanna Richardson, “Pakistani LIS Scholars’ Altmetrics in ResearchGate,” Program 51, no. 2, (2017):152–69, https://doi.org/10.1108/PROG-07-2016-0052

N. K. Sheeja and Susan K. Mathew, “ResearchGate Profiles of Naval Architecture Scientists in India: An Altmetric Analysis,” Library Philosophy and Practice (2019): 1–9, https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/2305/

Neil D. Joshi et al., “Social Media in Neurosurgery: Using ResearchGate,” World Neurosurgery 127 (2019): e950–e956, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.04.007

Nicole Muscanell and Sonja Utz, “Social Networking for Scientists: An Analysis on How and Why Academics Use ResearchGate,” Online Information Review 41, no. 5 (2017): 744–59, https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-07-2016-0185.

Peter Kraker and Elisabeth Lex, “A Critical Look at the ResearchGate Score as a Measure of Scientific Reputation,” (paper, Quantifying and Analysing Scholarly Communication on the Web (ASCW15), Oxford, UK, June 30, 2015): 7–9, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.35401.

Preeti Mahajan, Har Singh, and Anil Kumar, “Use of SNSs by the Researchers in India: A Comparative Study of Panjab University and Kurukshetra University,” Library Review 62, no. 8/9 (2013): 525–46

Richard Van Noorden, “The Science That’s Never Been Cited,” Nature 552 (2017): 162–64, https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-017-08404-0

Rishabh Shrivastava and Preeti Mahajan, “An Altmetric Analysis of ResearchGate Profiles of Physics Researchers: A Study of University of Delhi (India),” Performance Measurement and Metrics 18, no. 1 (2017): 52–66, https://doi.org/10.1108/PMM-07-2016-0033.

Rishabh Shrivastava and Preeti Mahajan, “Relationship amongst ResearchGate Altmetric Indicators and Scopus Bibliometric Indicators: The Case of Panjab University Chandigarh (India),” New Library World (2015), https://doi.org/10.1108/NLW-03-2015-0017.

Stefano Bortoli, Paolo Bouquet, and Themis Palpanas, “Social Networking: Power to the People,” in Papers presented in W3C Workshop on the Future of Social Networking Position, January, Barcelona (2009)

Stevan Harnad, “Publish or Perish—Self-Archive to Flourish: The Green Route to Open Access,” ERCIM News 64 (2006), http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/11715/1/harnad-ercim.pdf.

Vala Ali Rohani and Siew Hock Ow, “Eliciting Essential Requirements for Social Networks in Academic Environments,” in 2011 IEEE Symposium on Computers & Informatics (IEEE, 2011):171–76, https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCI.2011.5958905.

Webometrics Ranking of World Universities 2021, https://www.webometrics.info/en/asia/iran%20%28islamic%20republic%20of%29.

Published
2022-03-21
How to Cite
Valizadeh-Haghi, S., Nasibi-Sis, H., Shekofteh, M., & Rahmatizadeh, S. (2022). ResearchGate Metrics’ Behavior and Its Correlation with RG Score and Scopus Indicators. Information Technology and Libraries, 41(1). https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v41i1.14033
Section
Articles