An Omeka S Repository for Place- and Land-Based Teaching and Learning
Our small community college library developed a learning object repository to support a cross-institutional, land-based, multidisciplinary academic initiative using the open-source platform Omeka S. Drawing on critical, feminist, and open practices, we document the relational labor, dialogue, and tensions involved with this open education project. This case study shares our experience with tools and processes that may be helpful for other small-scale open education initiatives, including user-centered iterative design, copyright education, metadata design, and user-interface development in Omeka S.
Ashley Edwards, “Supporting Faculty in Indigenizing Curriculum and Pedagogy: Case Study of the Indigenous Curriculum Resource Centre,” in Ethnic Studies in Academic and Research Libraries, eds. Raymond Pun, Melissa Cardenas-Dow, and Kenya S. Flash (Chicago, IL: Association of College & Research Libraries, 2021), 171–72.
Brian M. Watson, “Grant Application for 50 Years On, Many Years Past,” IU ScholarWorks (March 2020), https://hdl.handle.net/2022/25593.
“CSS Editor,” Omeka S User Manual, accessed May 13, 2022, https://omeka.org/s/docs/user-manual/modules/csseditor/.
Dana Reijerkerk, “UX Design in Online Catalogs: Practical Issues with Implementing Traditional Knowledge (TK) Labels,” First Monday 25, no. 8 (August 2020), https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v25i8.10406.
Dolores Calderon, “Speaking Back to Manifest Destinies: A Land Education-Based Approach to Critical Curriculum Inquiry,” Environmental Education Research 20, no. 1, (2014): 24–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2013.865114.
Jane Anderson and Kim Christen, “‘Chuck a Copyright on It’: Dilemmas of Digital Return and the Possibilities for Traditional Knowledge Licenses and Labels,” Museum Anthropology Review 7, no. 1–2 (Spring-Fall 2013), 110.
Jessica Y. Dai and Lindsay Inge Carpenter, “Bad (Feminist) Librarians: Theories and Strategies for OER Librarianship,” International Journal of Open Educational Resources 3, no. 1 (May 2020): 152, https://doi.org/10.18278/ijoer.3.1.10.
Kathryn L. Sobocinski, “Section 6: Opportunities for Improving Assessment and Understanding of the Salish Sea,” in State of the Salish Sea, ed. K. L. Sobocinski (Bellingham: Salish Sea Institute, 2021), 213, http://doi.org/10.25710/vfhb-3a69.
Kimberly Christen, “Tribal Archives, Traditional Knowledge, and Local Contexts: Why the ‘s’ Matters,” Journal of Western Archives 6, no. 1 (2015), 13, https://doi.org/10.26077/78d5-47cf.
Libnamic, “Omeka S Fields as Tags,” Omeka S Modules, accessed May 13, 2022, https://omeka.org/s/modules/FieldsAsTags/.
“Mapping,” Omeka S User Manual, accessed May 13, 2022, https://omeka.org/s/docs/user-manual/modules/mapping/.
Nancy A. Van House, Mark H. Butler, Virginia Ogle, and Lisa Shiff, “User-Centered Iterative Design for Digital Libraries,” D-Lib Magazine (February 1996), http://webdoc.sub.gwdg.de/edoc/aw/d-lib/dlib/february96/02vanhouse.html.
“Project,” Omeka, accessed March 16, 2022, https://omeka.org/about/project/.
“Salish Sea Naming Project,” College of the Environment, Western Washington University, accessed March 17, 2022, https://cenv.wwu.edu/si/salish-sea-naming-project.
Tina Luo, Kirsten Hostetler, Candice Freeman, and Jill Stefaniak, ”The Power of Open: Benefits, Barriers, and Strategies for Integration of Open Educational Resources,” Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance, and e-Learning 35, no. 2 (October 2020): 149, https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2019.1677222.
“Vocabularies,” Omeka S User Manual, accessed May 13, 2022, https://omeka.org/s/docs/user-manual/content/vocabularies/.
“WCAG 2 Overview,” Web Accessibility Initiative, accessed May 13, 2022, https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/wcag/.
Copyright (c) 2022 Neah Ingram-Monteiro and Ro McKernan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.