Evaluation and Comparison of Discovery Tools: An Update

  • F. William Chickering Rider University
  • Sharon Q. Yang Associate Professor - Librarian Moore Library Rider University


Abstract: Selection and implementation of a web scale Discovery tool by The Rider University Libraries (RUL) in the 2011-2012 academic year revealed the practical complexity of the endeavor. Research into the state of adoption of Web-scale Discovery tools in North America and the evolution of product effectiveness provided a starting point. The study reported here evaluated a total of 14 major Discovery tools (3 open source and 10 proprietary). The evaluation involves a check list of 16 criteria recognized as the advanced features of a modern OPAC. Some of the features have been used in previous research on Discovery tools and the next generation catalog. The authors examined 5 to 7 library websites that deployed a Discovery tool before a determination is made as to the presence or absence of a feature for a particular Discovery tool. The purpose of the study is to evaluate and compare all the major Discovery tools. These findings will serve to update librarians on the latest development in the library user interface and assist them in their adoption of a Discovery tool.

Author Biographies

F. William Chickering, Rider University

Dean of University Libraries, Rider University since 2003

Visiting Associate Professor, Baccalaureate Honors Program

Sharon Q. Yang, Associate Professor - Librarian Moore Library Rider University


Associate Professor - Librarian

Systems Librarian, Rider University


Jason Vaughan . “Investigations into Library Web-Scale Discovery Services” Information Technology and Libraries 31, no. 1 (2012), 32-33. http://ejournals.bc.edu/ojs/index.php/ital/article/view/1916/1744

Q. S. Yang, and M. A. Hofmann, “Next generation or current generation? A study of the OPACs of 260 academic libraries in the USA and Canada,” Library Hi Tech 29 No. 2 (2011): 266-300.

M. Hofmann and Q. S. Yang, “"Discovering" What’s Changed: A Revisit of the OPACs of 260 Academic Libraries,” Library Hi Tech, 30 Issue 2, (2012) 253-274.

Alexander Pope in Brainyquote.com (http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/a/alexander_pope.html

F. William Chickering. “Linking Information Technologies: Benefits and Challenges,” Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on New Information Technologies, (Budapest, Hungary) December 1991. http://web.simmons.edu/~chen/nit/NIT%2791/019-chi.htm

Kristin Antelman, , Emily Lynema, and Andrew K. Pace “Toward a Twenty-First Century Library Catalog,” Information Technology and Libraries, Vol.25 No. 3, (2006) 128-39.

M. Breeding. “Plotting a New Course for Metasearch,” Computers in Libraries 25, no.2 (2005): 27‐29.

J. Carter. “Discovery: What Do You Mean by That?” Information Technology & Libraries, 28 no. 4(2009): 161-163.

P. Caplan. “On discovery tools, OPACs and the motion of library language,” Library Hi Tech, 30 no.1(2012): 108-115.

C. Diedrichs. “Discovery and Delivery: Making it Work for Users.” Serials Librarian, 56 no.1-4 (2009): 79. doi:10.1080/03615260802679127

Alex A. Dolski. “Information Discovery Insights Gained from MultiPAC, a Prototype Library Discovery System,” Information Technology & Libraries, 28 no. 4, (2009): 173.

Marshall Breeding. “The State of the Art in Library Discovery,” Computers in Libraries 30 no.1 (2010); 31-34.

Fabbi, Jennifer L. “Focus as Impetus for Organizational Learning,” Information Technology & Libraries. 28 no. 4, (2009):164-171.

Way, Douglas “The Impact of Web-scale Discovery on the Use of a Library Collection,”Serials Review. 36 no. 4: (2010): 214-220. DOI: 10.1016/j.serrev.2010.07.002

Marshall Breeding, “Discovery Layer Interfaces,” Library Technology Guides, (2012), http://www.librarytechnology.org/discovery.pl (accessed December 19, 2012).


Sharon Q. Yang and Kurt Wagner, “Evaluating and Comparing Discovery Tools: How Close Are We towards Next Generation Catalog?” Library Hi Tech 28, no. 4 (2010): 690-709.

S. Q. Yang & M.A. Hofmann, “Next Generation or Current Generation? A Study of the OPACs of 260 Academic Libraries in the United States and

Canada.” Library Hi Tech, 29 no. 2 (2011), 266-300.

M.A. Hofmann, & S.Q. Yang, (2011, July/August). “How Next-Gen R U? A review of academic OPACS in the United States and Canada.” Computers in Libraries, 31 no.6) (2010): 26-29.

Brown Library of Virginia Western Community College, "Primo-Frequently Asked Questions," December 29, 2012, http://www.virginiawestern.edu/library/primo-faq.php#popularity_ranking.

S. Q, Yang and Kurt Wagner, "Evaluating and Comparing Discovery Tools: How Close Are We towards Next Generation catalog?" Library Hi Tech, 28 no. 4, (2010): 690-709.

Yanyi Lee and Sharon Q. Yang, “Folksonomies as Subject Access- A Survey of Tagging in Library Online Catalogs and Discovery Layers” IFLA Publication Series. Accepted for publication (2012).

How to Cite
Chickering, F. W., & Yang, S. Q. (2014). Evaluation and Comparison of Discovery Tools: An Update. Information Technology and Libraries, 33(2), 5-30. https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v33i2.3471