Engine Of Innovation: Building the High Performance Catalog
Numerous studies have indicated the sophisticated web-based search engines have eclipsed the primary importance of the library catalog as the premier tool for researchers in Higher education. We submit that the catalog remains central to the research process. Through a series of strategic enhancements, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, in partnership with the other members of the Triangle Research Libraries Network, has made the catalog a carrier of services in addition to bibliographic data, facilitating not simply discovery but also delivery of the information researchers seek.
Antelman, Kristen, Emily Lynema, and Andrew K. Pace. “Toward a Twenty-First Century Library Catalog.” Information Technology and Libraries 25, no. 3 (2006):128-138, doi: 10.6017/ital.v25i3.3342.
Bennett, Michael J. “OPAC Design Enhancements and Their Effects on Circulation and Resource Sharing within the Library Consortium Environment.” Information Technology and Libraries 26, no. 1 (2007): 36-46, doi: 10.6017/ital.v26i1.3287.
Breeding, Marshall. “Next-Gen Library Catalogs.” Library Technology Reports (July/August 2007): 5-14.
Calhoun, Karen. The Changing Nature of the Catalog and Its Integration with Other Discovery Tools, Final Report, Prepared for the Library of Congress. Ithaca, NY: K. Calhoun, 2006, http://www.loc.gov/catdir/calhoun-report-final.pdf.
Coyle, Karen. “The Library Catalog: Some Possible Futures.” The Journal of Academic Librarianship 33, no. 3 (2007): 414-416, doi: 10.1016/j.acalib.2007.03.001.
De Rosa, Cathy, Joanne Cantrell, Diane Cellentani, Janet Hawk, Lillie Jenkins, and Alane Wilson. Perceptions of Libraries and Information Resources: A Report to the OCLC Membership. Dublin, Ohio: OCLC Online Computer Library Center, 2005, https://www.oclc.org/en-US/reports/2005perceptions.html.
De Rosa, Cathy, Joanne Cantrell, Mattew Carbon, Peggy Galagher, Janet Hawk, and Charlotte Sturtz. Perceptions of Libraries, 2010: Context and Community: A Report to the OCLC Membership. Dublin, Ohio: OCLC Online Computer Library Center, 2011, http://oclc.org/content/dam/oclc/reports/2010perceptions/2010perceptions_all.pdf.
Dempsey, Lorcan. “Thirteen Ways of Looking at Libraries, Discovery, and the Catalog: Scale, Workflow, Attention.” Educause Review Online (December 10, 2012), http://www.educause.edu/ero/article/thirteen-ways-looking-libraries-discovery-and-catalog-scale-workflow-attention.
Hildreth, Charles R. “Beyond Boolean; Designing the Next Generation of Online Catalogs.” Library Trends (Spring 1987): 647-667, http://hdl.handle.net/2142/7500.
Housewright, Ross, and Roger Schonfeld. Ithaka’s 2006 Studies of Key Stakeholders in the Digital Transformation in Higher Education, New York: Ithaka, 2008.
Ithaka S+R. UNC Chapel Hill Faculty Survey: Report of Findings. Unpublished report to the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2013.
Ithaka S+R. UNC Chapel Hill Graduate Student Survey: Report of Findings. Unpublished report to the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2014.
Ithaka S+R. UNC Chapel Hill Undergraduate Survey: Report of Findings. Unpublished report to the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2014.
Lown, Cory, Tito Sierra, and Josh Boyer. “How Users Search the Library from a Single Search Box.” College and Research Libraries 74, no. 3 (2013): 227-241, http://crl.acrl.org/content/74/3/227.full.pdf.
Markey, Karen. “The Online Library Catalog: Paradise Lost and Paradise Regained?” D-Lib Magazine, 13, no. 1/2 (2007): 1-15, doi:10.1045/January2007-markey.
Mi, Jia, and Cathy Weng. “Revitalizing the Library OPAC: Interface, Searching, and Display Challenges.” Information Technology and Libraries 27, no. 1 (2008): 5-18, doi:10.6017/ital.v27i1.3259.
Morgan, Eric Lease. “Use and Understand; the Inclusion of Services against Texts in Library Catalogs and Discovery Systems." Library Hi Tech (2012): 35-59, doi:10.1108/07378831211213201
Niu, Xi, and Bradley M. Hemminger. “Beyond Text Querying and Ranking List: How People are Searching through Faceted Catalogs in Two Library Environments.” Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 47, no. 1 (2010): 1-9, doi:10.1002/meet.14504701294
Pennell, Benjamin, and Jill Sexton. “Implementing a Real-time Suggestion Service in a Library Discovery Layer.” Code4Lib Journal 10 (2010), http://journal.code4lib.org/articles/3022.
Pennell, Charles, Natalie Sommerville, and Derek A. Rodriguez. “Shared Resources, Shared Records: Letting Go of Local Metadata Hosting within a Consortium Environment.” Library Resources & Technical Services 57, no. 4 (2013): 227-238, doi:10.5860/lrts.57n4.227.
Ramdeen, Sarah, and Bradley M. Hemminger. “A Tale of Two Interfaces: How Facets Affect the Library Catalog Search.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 63, no. 4 (2012): 702–715, doi:10.1002/asi.21689.
Schonfeld, Roger C., and Kevin M. Guthrie. “The Changing Information Services Needs of Faculty.” Educause Review 42, no. 4 (July/August 2007): 8-9, http://www.educause.edu/ero/article/changing-information-services-needs-faculty.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors that submit to Information Technology and Libraries agree to the Copyright Notice.