Exploratory Subject Searching in Library Catalogs: Reclaiming the Vision
Librarians have had innovative ideas for ways to use subject and classification data to provide an improved online search experience for decades, and yet, after thirty-plus years of improvements in online catalogs, users continue to struggle with narrowing down their subject searches to produce manageable lists containing only relevant results. This article reports on one attempt to rectify that situation by radically re-envisioning the library catalog interface, enabling users to interact with and explore their search results in a profoundly different way. This new interface gives users the option of viewing a graphical overview of their results, grouped by discipline and subject. Results are depicted as a two-level treemap, which gives users a visual representation of the disciplinary perspectives (as represented by the main classes of the Library of Congress Classification) and topics (as represented by elements of the Library of Congress Subject Headings) included in the results.
Antelman, Kristen, Emily Lynema, and Andrew Pace. “Toward a Twenty-First Century Library Catalog.” Information Technology and Libraries 25, no. 3 (2006): 128-139.
Aris, Aleks, Ben Shneiderman, Vahed Qazvinian, and Dragomir Radev. “Visual Overviews for Discovering Key Papers and Influences Across Research Fronts.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60 (2009): 2219-2228. doi: 10.1002/asi.v60:11
Bates, Marcia. “Subject Access in Online Catalogs: A Design Model.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science 37, no. 6 (1986): 357-376. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(198611)37:6<357::AID-ASI1>3.0.CO;2-H
Bauer, Kathleen. “Yale University Library VuFind Test—Undergraduates.” November 11, 2008. http://www.library.yale.edu/ usability/studies/summary_undergraduate.doc
Belkin, N.J., R.N. Oddy, and H.M. Brooks. “ASK for Information Retrieval: Part I. Background and Theory.” Journal of Documentation (1982): 61-71. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/eb026722
Borgman, Christine. “Why Are Online Catalogs Still Hard to Use?,” Journal of the American Society for Information Science (1996): 493-503. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199607)47:7<493::AID-ASI3>3.0.CO;2-P
Chapman, Suzanne, Shevon Desai, Kat Hagedorn, Ken Varnum, Sonali Mishra, and Julie Piacentine. “Manually Classifying User Search Queries on an Academic Library Web Site.” Journal of Web Librarianship 7 (2013): 401-421, doi: 10.1080/19322909.2013.842096
Cochrane, Pauline A. “Subject Access--Free or Controlled? The Case of Papua New Guinea.” In Redesign of Catalogs and Indexes for Improved Online Subject Access: Selected Papers of Pauline A. Cochrane, 275-287. Phoenix: Oryx Press, 1985. Previously published in Online Public Access to Library Files: Conference Proceedings: The Proceedings of a Conference Held at the University of Bath, 3-5 September 1984. Oxford: Elsevier, 1985.
Cutter, Charles Ammi. Rules for a Printed Dictionary Catalog. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1876.
Dunne, Cody, Ben Shneiderman, Robert Gove, Judith Klavans, and Bonnie Dorr. “Rapid Understanding of Scientific Paper Collections: Integrating Statistics, Text Analysis, and Visualization.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 63 (2012): 2351-2369. doi: 10.1002/asi.22652
Fagan, Jody Condit. “Usability Studies of Faceted Browsing: A Literature Review.” Information Technology and Libraries 29, no. 2 (2010): 58-66. doi: 10.6017/ital.v29i2.3144
Head, Alison J. Learning the Ropes: How Freshmen Conduct Course Research Once They Enter College. December 4, 2013. http://projectinfolit.org/images/pdfs/pil_2013_freshmenstudy_fullreport.pdf
Kaiser, Jasper, and Anthony Hodge. “AquaBrowser Library: Search, Discover, Refine.” Library Hi Tech News (December 2005): 9-12. doi: 10.1108/07419050510644329.
Markey, Karen. “The Online Library Catalog: Paradise Lost and Paradise Regained?.” D-Lib Magazine 13, no. 1/2 (2007). http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january07/markey/01markey.html
Olson, Tod. “Utility of a Faceted Catalog for Scholarly Research.” Library Hi Tech (2007): 550-561. doi: 10.1108/07378830710840509
Shneiderman, Ben. “Dynamic Queries for Visual Information Seeking.” IEEE Software 11 (1994): 70-77. doi: 10.1109/52.329404.
Shneiderman, Ben. “The Eyes Have It: A Task by Data Type Taxonomy for Information Visualizations.” September, 1996. http://drum.lib.umd.edu/bitstream/1903/5784/1/TR_96-66.pdf
Shneiderman, Ben. “The Future of Interactive Systems and the Emergence of Direct Manipulation.” Behaviour & Information Technology 1 (1982): 237-256. doi: 10.1080/01449298208914450
Shneiderman, Ben. “Treemaps for Space-Constrained Visualization of Hierarchies: Including the History of Treemap Research at the University of Maryland.” Accessed October 6, 2014. http://www.cs.umd.edu/hcil/treemap-history/
Svenonius, Elaine. “Use of Classification in Online Retrieval.” Library Resources and Technical Services 27, no. 1 (1983): 76-80. http://alcts.ala.org/lrts/lrtsv25no1.pdf.
Ward, David, Jim Hahn, and Kirsten Feist. “Autocomplete as a Research Tool: A Study on Providing Search Suggestions.” Information Technology and Libraries 31, no. 4 (2012): 6-19. doi: 10.6017/ital.v31i4.1930
Wei, Furu, Shixia Liu, Yangqiu Song, Shimei Pan, Michelle X. Zhou, Weihong Qian, Lei Shi, Li Tan, and Qiang Zhang. "TIARA: A Visual Exploratory Text Analytic System," in Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, ACM (2010): pp. 153-162. doi: 10.1145/1835804.1835827