The "Champagne Tower" of Science Publishing

Authors

  • Sabina Siebert

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6017/ihe.2018.0.10564

Keywords:

journals, publications overflow in science, science publishing

Abstract

This article discusses the hierarchical nature of science publishing, whereby journals are organized in tiers with the most prestigious elite journals at the top (Cell, Nature, Science), and lowest-ranked journals at the bottom. When rejected from the top-tier journals, authors usually aim for a lower tier of journals, with some choosing smaller, specialist journals for the outlet of their work. Recently, however, a different
mechanism of cascading the papers down the hierarchy of journals has become popular, i.e., editors arrange to pass the rejected papers, with the authors’ permission, to their “sister journals” bearing the same brand. These transfer arrangements may be seen beneficial for the authors, as they reduce the publication time, but they also pose difficulties for smaller specialist journals that lose their share
of the market and experience a fall in manuscript submissions.

Author Biography

Sabina Siebert

Sabina Siebert is professor of management, Adam Smith Business
School, University of Glasgow, UK. 

Downloads

Published

2018-06-11

How to Cite

Siebert, S. (2018). The "Champagne Tower" of Science Publishing. International Higher Education, 94, 21–22. https://doi.org/10.6017/ihe.2018.0.10564

Issue

Section

Publishing and Journals