The Benefits of Enterprise Architecture for Library Technology Management: An Exploratory Case Study

Sam Searle

Abstract


This case study describes how librarians and enterprise architects at an Australian university worked together to document key components of the Library’s “as-is” enterprise architecture (EA). The article covers the rationale for conducting this activity, how work was scoped, the processes used, and the outputs delivered. The author discusses the short-term benefits of undertaking this work, with practical examples of how outputs from this process are being used to better plan future library system replacements, upgrades, and enhancements. Longer-term benefits may also accrue in the future as the results of this architecture work inform the Library’s IT planning and strategic procurement. This article has implications for practice for library technology specialists as it validates views from other practitioners on the benefits for libraries in adopting enterprise architecture methods and for librarians in working alongside enterprise architects within their organizations.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Griffith University, “Griffith Digital Strategy 2020,” 2016, https://www.griffith.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0026/365561/griffithuniversity-digital-strategy.pdf.

The Open Group, “TOGAF®, an Open Group Standard,” accessed June 4, 2018, http://www.opengroup.org/subjectareas/enterprise/togaf.

Federation of Enterprise Architecture Professional Associations, “A Common Perspective on Enterprise Architecture,” 2013, http://feapo.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/Common-Perspectives-on-Enterprise-Architecture-v15.pdf.

Judith Pirani, “Manage Today’s IT Complexities with an Enterprise Architecture Practice,” EDUCAUSE Review, February 16, 2017, https://er.educause.edu/blogs/2017/2/manage-todays-it-complexities-with-an-enterprise-architecture-practice.

Stephen Kevin Anthony, “Implementing Service Oriented Architecture at the Canada Institute for Scientific and Technical Information,” The Serials Librarian 55, no. 1–2 (July 3, 2008): 235–53, https://doi.org/10.1080/03615260801970907.

Kristiina Hormia-Poutanen, “The Finnish National Digital Library: National Library of Finland developing a National Infrastructure in Collaboration with Libraries, Archives and Museums,” accessed March 24, 2018, http://travesia.mcu.es/portalnb/jspui/bitstream/10421/6683/1/fndl.pdf.

Karl W. Schornagel, “Information Technology Strategic Planning: A Well-Developed Framework Essential to Support the Library’s and Future IT Needs. Report No. 2008-PA-105,” May 2, 2009, https://web.archive.org/web/20090502092325/https://www.loc.gov/about/oig/reports/2009/Final%20IT%20Strategic%20Planning%20Report%20Mar%202009.pdf.

Joel Willemssen, “Information Technology: Library of Congress Needs to Implement Recommendations to Address Management,” December 2, 2015, https://www.gao.gov/assets/680/673955.pdf.

Rebecca Parker and Dana McKay, “It’s the End of the World as We Know It . . . or Is It? Looking Beyond the New Librarianship Paradigm,” in Marketing and Outreach for the Academic Library, ed. Bradford Lee Eden (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2016): 81–106.

New South Wales State Archives and Records Authority, “Recordkeeping in Brief 59—An Introduction to Enterprise Architecture for Records Managers,” 2011, https://web.archive.org/web/20120502184420/https://www.records.nsw.gov.au/recordkeeping/government-recordkeeping-manual/guidance/recordkeeping-in-brief/recordkeeping-in-brief-59-an-introduction-to-enterprise-architecture-for-records-managers.

Jolyon Suthers, “Information and Technology Architecture,” 2016, accessed April 6, 2018 https://www.caudit.edu.au/system/files/Media%20library/Resources%20and%20Files/Communities/Enterprise%20Architecture/EA2016%20Joylon%20Suthers%20CAUDIT%20EA%20Symposium%202016%20-%20IT%20Architecture%20v2_0.pdf.

The Open Group, “TOGAF® 9.1,” 2011, 2018, http://pubs.opengroup.org/architecture/togaf9-doc/arch/index.html: Part 1 Introduction Section 2: Core Concepts.

Orbus Software, “iServer for Enterprise Architecture,” accessed March 26, 2018, https://www.orbussoftware.com/enterprise-architecture/capabilities/.

EBSCO, “GOBI®,” accessed June 5, 2018, https://gobi.ebsco.com/gobi.

Google Scholar, “Google Scholar Support for Libraries,” accessed June 5, 2018, https://scholar.google.com/intl/en/scholar/libraries.html.

National Library of Australia, “Trove,” accessed June 5, 2018, https://trove.nla.gov.au/; Australian National Data Service, “Research Data Australia,” accessed June 5, 2018, https://researchdata.ands.org.au/.

Mike Bostock, “D3.Js—Data-Driven Documents,” accessed April 3, 2018, https://d3js.org/.

Breeding, Marshall, “Five Key Technology Trends for 2018,” Computers in Libraries, 37, no.10 (December 2017), http://www.infotoday.com/cilmag/dec17/Breeding--Five-Key-Technology-Trends-for-2018.shtml




DOI: https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v37i4.10437

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2018 Information Technology and Libraries

License URL: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/

/ojs/public/site/images/ejadmin/lita_67

ISSN:2163-5226

SCImago Journal & Country Rank data for ITAL