Comparability of Computer and Paper-and-Pencil Versions of Algebra and Biology Assessments

Authors

  • Do-Hong Kim University of North Carolina, Charlotte
  • Huynh Huynh University of South Carolina

Keywords:

Computer-based testing, online testing, statewide assessment, Algebra, Biology, End-of-Course examinations, technology, assessment, pencil, PPT, CBT

Abstract

This study examined comparability of student scores obtained from computerized and paper-and-pencil formats of the large-scale statewide end-of-course (EOC) examinations in the two subject areas of Algebra and Biology. Evidence in support of comparability of computerized and paper-based tests was sought by examining scale scores, item parameter estimates, test characteristic curves, test information functions, Rasch ability estimates at the content domain level, and the equivalence of the construct. Overall, the results support the comparability of computerized and paper-based tests at the item-level, subtest-level and whole test-level in both subject areas. For both subject areas, no evidence was found to suggest that the administration mode changed the construct being measured.

Downloads

Published

2007-12-21

How to Cite

Kim, D.-H., & Huynh, H. (2007). Comparability of Computer and Paper-and-Pencil Versions of Algebra and Biology Assessments. The Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment, 6(4). Retrieved from https://ejournals.bc.edu/index.php/jtla/article/view/1634

Issue

Section

Articles