Bellarmine Law Society Review

In the fall issue of the Bellarmine Law Society Review's (BLSR) thirteenth volume, a diverse group of scholars, including four undergraduates and a standout high-school senior, delve into compelling legal topics. The exploration encompasses a broad spectrum, ranging from Supreme Court rationale and psychiatry to the intricacies of LGBT+ rights and rap music—all viewed through the discerning lens of legal analysis. First, high-school senior Alex Chen navigates the uncertainties surrounding stare decisis interpretation with a thematic approach that unveils the foundational aspects of the Court's opinions and anticipates their future applications. Second, Joshua Darrish's analysis highlights cases like McCreary County v. ACLU and Van Orden v. Perry to accentuate the widening gap between separationist and accommodationist interpretations of the Bill of Rights. In doing so, Darrish argues that maintaining the Establishment Clause's vague nature will safeguard the secularity of the judicial system. Third, Simon Hoefling explores the insanity defense through a cognitive lens rather than one of volition. His argument posits that this approach establishes a higher standard for comprehending criminal culpability. Fourth, Brendan Mahoney dissects the implications of RICO charges, examining their impact on the admission of rap lyrics in the judicial system. Notably, Mahoney invokes topical cases such as State of Georgia v. Kahlieff Adams et al. to argue that restricting charges threatens a rapper's civil liberties. Finally, Darya Treanor examines the historical interpretations of the Second Amendment under D.C. v. Heller to advocate for a broader perspective that not only incorporates but also expands the liberties of LGBTQ+ Americans.